![hd calibration disc hd calibration disc](https://www.burosch.de/images/zz_693.jpg)
Most LCDs do this by setting the backlight intensity, so set this value as high as possible. Watch the screen from a close distance while you do this. Set a value just below the threshold, and try to keep the image as "black" as possible.
![hd calibration disc hd calibration disc](https://i.ebayimg.com/thumbs/images/g/3doAAOSw5mpbOWLD/s-l300.jpg)
#Hd calibration disc windows
Set your Windows desktop to solid black and hide the task bar, then use the brightness control on your monitor to find the threshold where the image starts to turn dark grey (45 out of 100 on the 400DX). To me, this is a most important value, as it highly determines the perceived image contrast. So I used ATI's gamma adjustment in CCC.įirst, let's adjust the black point.
![hd calibration disc hd calibration disc](https://64.media.tumblr.com/465a5d51f930e3898672f17a8619e8a0/f5f11905f4d0c30b-a6/s400x600/a6d25f0e49f72038d505823a03ca4a192aad5738.jpg)
Some monitors offer a gamma control, mine doesn't. gamma adjustment (adjustment of grey tones).We will be going through the signal chain from back to front, starting with the monitor. The ambient light should be low during screen adjustment. I don't know wheter this is a bug or not, but that ruled out DVI instantly on that device, although I could have gotten the native resolution without undersampling. The 400DX does offer DVI, but lacks the capability for black point adjustment - both brightness and contrast controls seem to modify the white point. The 32WL58 alternatively only offers analog VGA, giving an image quality that was unimpressive. I ended up with somthing like 1088圆84 for the 32WLx1016 for the 400DX.Īs you see, despite all the drawbacks, I settled for HDMI in both cases. In both cases, the image edges were cut off for some reason, so the desktop had to be resized to fit the panel, further reducing image resolution. The 32WL58's native resulution, which is supposed to be 1366x768, did not give a good enough picture, I had to settle for 720p. The 400DX's native resolution of 1366x768 is available only when using DVI. I am not into HDMI enough as to point out a reason for this, but it occured to me on both monitors. That might depend on the monitor too.Īlso, HDMI never let me use the native panel resolution. For example, the HDMI input offers a color saturation control, while DVI does not. Also, the two offered different sets of image controls on the monitor. Right away, a HDMI connection seemed to deliver a very contrasted, maybe over-contrasted picture with lots of black in it, while DVI delivered less contrast and color. In my experience, a great difrerence is made by the way the monitor is connected to the computer. See here for more details on that: Greyscale & Colour Calibration For Dummies HDMI vs DVI If you want to get really adventurous, then buy yourself an EyeOne Colorimeter and calibrate like a pro, including adjusting your grayscale. See the forum post Display calibration for more details: a decoder for the new track could not be found. Use MPC Video Decoder or ffdshow DXVA to leverage hardware acceleration and get the best possible picture quality.